Bearing News

30 years later ‘Hazelwood v. Kuhlmeier’ still impacts student speech

In the United States teenage pregnancies or students dealing with divorce is not always unusual. In 2015 10 in 1000 people experienced divorce.

In 1983 however, student journalists at Hazelwood East High School in St. Louis wrote a story detailing divorce and teen pregnancy in their school newspaper, The Spectrum. Robert E. Reynolds, the principal of Hazelwood East, however, did not view the story as appropriate for publication, because of it’s controversial nature.

Reynolds believed that though the pregnancy story used false names ‘to keep the identity of these girls a secret,’ readers would be able to identify the students who were pregnant. He also thought the story’s references to sex and birth control were inappropriate for some of the readers.

In addition, Reynolds was concerned that the father of the student in the story about divorce wasn’t being given a chance to address the complaints listed in the article.

Student journalist Cathy Kuhlmeier and two others brought the case to the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri. The students argued that their first amendment rights were violated because of principal Reynolds censorship. However, the court ruled that the students’ first amendment rights were not in fact violated.

The US 8th Circuit Court heard the case and overruled the lower court, determining that the students’ freedom of speech rights were in fact infringed upon.

Then in 1987, the case reached the Supreme Court where in 1988 the Court voted 5-3 that the students’ free speech rights were not being violated and that the principal had the right to veto the story’s publication.

The Court noted that because the school sponsored the paper it had a “legitimate interest in preventing the publication of articles that it deemed inappropriate.” In fact, the Court said the paper was not intended as a public forum and the Journalism II class students should be edited by the school.

Thirty years later students here disagree with that ruling.

“Everybody deserves to have their voices to have their voice,” junior Jocelyn Heimsoth says, “especially in politics, and in school. Everyone must consider one anothers’ rights, because everyone in this country, and this world, wants to be heard.”

“The students have the choice to publish to whatever they want. The Supreme Court took away their rights to freedom of speech, and this still has a legacy today. Looking back, this is one of the major cases that we in the 21st Century get confused by.” --Josh Lardizabal, senior"The students made a sound decision to publish this story in the first place. It’s a really interesting article that is relevant to many high school students. I think to a certain very minimal degree schools should say students can’t publish an article. But only if it is harmful to the student body.”--Grace Kirk, senior
“I think the students have the right to want to publish anything they want. As long as it is not blatantly offensive to a group of people. However if they are just covering news about divorce & teen pregnancy it’s just ideas that they be able to express and not get in trouble for them. If they [the Supreme Court] believe in free speech then they should be able to let the students publish their story.”
“The Supreme Court’s decision was wrong. They shouldn’t have said it because first of all, people have freedom of speech. If it’s not something that is slandaring or hurting anyone, then the students should be able to publish it. The Supreme Court should’ve thought more about who they sided with.”

Related posts

Leave a Comment

5 × three =